| |
 |
|
Chapter 19
|
|
|
FORTY YEARS AFTER—CRIME AND PUNISHMENT
By Avro Manhattan |
The Vatican, and with it the Catholic Church, after
the disappearance of the Catholic State of Croatia, never claimed any
responsibility, not even a partial one, for the atrocities committed
there. Indeed, when accused, they disclaimed any connection with the
whole Croatian "experiment."
When asked to express their abhorrence for the deeds
committed by the Ustashis of Catholic Croatia, they both kept their
silence. Silence means approval. That is why, since the downfall of
Independent Croatia, the Catholic Church has constantly helped the
scattered remnants of the Ustashi at home and abroad. Not only during
the pontificate of Pius XII, but equally during those of "good Pope John
XXIII" and Pope Paul VI.
Catholic laymen, Catholic priests and Catholic monks
continued to back the Ustashi as actively as ever. Underground
organizations were formed in many parts of the world. Ustashi secret
headquarters were set up, e.g. in Madrid, Spain, where incidentally A.
Pavelic had installed himself following his attempted assassination in
the Argentine. Indeed, while Pius XII was still alive, another no less
active centre sprang up in Rome itself.
Simultaneous to all this, Catholic clergy within
Croatia exerted themselves as relentlessly as their companions abroad.
As typified by a group of nine of them arrested in Osjek, Northern
Croatia, and tried in March 1960. While two of them were theological
students the other seven were Catholic padres led by Father Ciril Koss
and Father Ivan Kopic.
In 1964, the Brotherhood of the Cross, a Catholic
Croatian organization in West Germany, was dissolved on the orders of
the German Government, after a bomb attack in that country. Its leader?
Father Madic Skoko, a Catholic priest. Following a three months long
trial the Germans condemned him to four years hard labour.
In 1965, the Ustashi became so blatantly active in
Australia, where they terrorized fellow Catholics into supporting their
activities that the Australian Government had to take drastic measures
against them. Similar cases occurred in other countries, e.g. in the USA
where bombs were made to explode simultaneously in sundry localities in
1967.
These were not the sporadic exertions of desperados.
But the coordinated activities of the Ustashi waiting for "The Day."
One of their headquarters, which after the Second
World War had been set up in Rome in 1960, was transferred to the
Croatian capital itself, Zagreb. This, it must be remembered, during the
pontificate of Pope John XXIII (1958-1963), the father of Ecumenism.
The Ustashi correspondence, documents and
instructions, significantly enough, were found hidden inside the walls
of the Franciscan monastery of that city. The Ustashi leader? A
Franciscan monk, Father Rudi Jerak, who had been recruiting members
while giving them religious instruction. Father Jerak was arrested, with
fourteen other Catholics who were running terroristic organizations
"with the aim of creating a separate State of Croatia"[1]
In 1966, the new socialist, Pope Paul VI (1963-1978),
as we have already seen, promoted Mgr. Seper, Cardinal. Seper became
Head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. His department
became responsible for guarding against "theological errors."
Cardinal Seper, it must be remembered, was the
successor of Archbishop Stepinac of Zagreb.
The silent but effective protection of the Vatican for
the scattered Ustashi continued uninterrupted from the downfall of
Ustashi Croatia. Polish Pope, John Paul II, globe trotting the world
with clamorous demands for "respect and observance of human rights."
like his papal predecessors, never mentioned or condemned the Ustashi
atrocities.
The thousands of Ustashi who fled to various
countries, helped by the Vatican itself, once settled in their host
lands were protected, ipso facto, by the local Catholic clergy. The
local clergy and their lay associates, that is Catholic laymen, then set
out to see that the Ustashi were protected, not only by absconding
themselves within the local population but, above all, under an umbrella
of legalized protection.
This was made possible by the passing of legislation
which could impede the arrest or the extradition of what was termed "war
criminals" wanted either by Yugoslavia, or by the Allied war
tribunals.The legislation was inspired and often successfully carried
out by Catholic bodies and associated Catholic politicians on a regional
and even national level. The campaign was particularly effective in
Australia, Canada and the USA. The Catholic Church, having provided a
legislative umbrella, then helped the "Ustashi refugees" financially,
with jobs and with a prudent integration into their new community.
Many managed to be integrated and vanished. New
identities or legalized camouflages helped with their absorption into
the community. During the first few years their integration went
smoothly. Then, however, as their true identity became known steps were
taken, either by the authorities in Europe or those in the countries of
their adoption, to bring them to justice; even to extradite them to the
localities of their crimes.
Several were arrested and suffered expulsion, some
appeared before tribunals. Most of them, however, protected as they were
by the Catholic Church, managed to escape the legal net. This was done
not only by minor former Ustashis, but equally by major ones.
The most notorious case was that of Andrija Artukovic,
Croatian Minister of the Interior and later Minister of Justice.
In the Croatian Cabinet, he was the spokesman for
Archbishop Stepinac. Artukovic was born in Croatia and was educated in
Franciscan schools. He studied law at the University of Zagreb, where he
became a fanatical advocate of the Catholicity and independence of a
self-governing Catholic Croatia.
After the Croatian Government collapsed, when Tito
partisans joined the Soviet armies, Artukovic, like thousands of other
Ustashi, fled the country, helped by Catholic clergy. They lived in
adjacent countries, mostly in Switzerland, Austria, and also in Catholic
Ireland.
Many reached the shore of the USA. Artukovic went to
the USA in July 1948, under a visitor's visa issued to him in the name
of Aloys Anich. The visa and other documents were obtained via the
Catholic organizations at the Vatican and in the USA. The Knights of
Columbus helped, since Artukovic became a Knight of Columbus.
In 1949, Artukovic applied for residence status under
the Displaced Person Act. In March 1951, however, the Yugoslav
Government made a formal demand that Artukovic be returned for
prosecution "as a war criminal." Immediately, the whole of the Catholic
machinery in the USA was set in motion to protect Artukovic.
How did Artukovic manage to flee Catholic Croatia
after its collapse?
Artukovic like Pavelic took refuge in Italy, hiding in
various monasteries and residing even in Rome. Under the direct
protection of the Vatican, he was supplied with false documents and went
to Catholic Ireland where the vigilant Catholic hierarchs looked after
him. They provided him with other false documents which allowed him into
the USA where Catholic Irish officials saw to it that he was welcomed,
settled and protected.
The Catholic protective umbrella, however, did not
prevent his identity from becoming known. The result was that
proceedings were taken, with the view of his arrest by the USA as a war
criminal.
The Catholic authorities, however, with the aid of lay
Catholic legal organizations, managed to pass certain legislative
measures on a local and national level, as already indicated, which
protected him from arrest.
When steps were taken for his extradition, these also
were nullified, by legal, semi-legal and equivocal or conflicting legal
quibbles, which rendered him practically immune.
The protection of the Catholic Church of America
seemed impregnable. This was demonstrated by the fact that it took the
USA and Yugoslavia decades to have Artukovic extradited from the USA.
Artukovic lived peacefully for over 40 years in the
U.S. and was finally extradited from there in February 1986 after a
legal battle which lasted well over 30 long years. A sombre spectacle of
the tremendous power of the Catholic Church in America.
Brought before a court in Zagreb, frail and haggard,
the former Interior Minister, known as the Balkans Butcher, was
pronounced guilty of war crimes and sentenced to death.
Throughout the four weeks trial he pled his innocence.
Artukovic was convicted of four specific crimes, including the murder of
civilians and prisoners of war.
The authorities, and above all the Catholic press
world wide, beginning with the USA media, emphasized that he was
convicted of "the mass murder of Jews, Gypsies, and others." Some
specified "and of Serbs."
The distortion of the specific racial-sectarian
motive, which had motivated the Catholic lay and clerical authorities
for conniving with the Ustashi massacre of almost 700,000 Orthodox
Serbs, would be incredible had it not happened.
The American mass media never mentioned the religious
motivation, plus the racial one, which had inspired the Croatian
massacre. The Catholic Church was never blamed, or even mentioned as
having had any part in the Croatian affair. Not a word of condemnation,
criticism or even impartial reminder of her responsibility.
The State Department saw to it that it should be so.
Since, by then, the USA and the Vatican had exchanged ambassadors, and
the Papal Ambassador in Washington had seen to it that the Catholic mass
media of the USA be briefed about what to say.
The emphasis of the media was that Artukovic had been
sentenced to death because of the mass murder of Jews and Gypsies and,
as if by chance, also of Serbs. The fact that the mass murder had been
of Serbs and of Orthodox Serbs, was never even given a hint. This
exculpated the Catholic Church. Indeed, to millions, the Vatican and the
Church had nothing to do with the massacre whatsoever!
To render the sentence more convincing, and to make it
appear as having nothing to do with Catholic religious persecution, the
court of Zagreb, which had previously discussed the whole trial with the
USA and the Vatican authorities, then accused Artukovic of ordering "a
massacre of civilians in 1942, the murder of 450 civilian deportees on
the road to a concentration camp, the murder of a prominent lawyer in
1941, and the killing of captured Yugoslav partisans in 1943" (Reuter
reports)[2]
Not a word or even a hint of the religious nature of
the massacre, or of the fact that Catholic padres and monks had been in
charge of concentration camps where hundreds of thousands had been
tortured and murdered, or had been forced to accept Catholic baptism to
save themselves from torture or execution.
 |
|
Andrija Artakovic, led from
the Court of Zagreb, after being sentenced to death, 14 May
1986, for war crimes in Yugoslavia.This was the general captions
of the World Press after Artukovic's sentence; not a word
indicating the kind of war crimes which he committed. In
fact, in many articles dealing with the four weeks court
trials, the Catholic Church was hardly mentioned. The
particular sectarian character, and anti-Orthodox
nature of the Croatian massacres, were never |
|
indicated, with rare exceptions, by
either the British or the American media. Indeed, the
Vatican had managed to exert such censorship about the whole
affair that the emphasis of the world media was that Artukovic had been responsible for the death of a few
hundred Jews, Gypsies, and a few Serbs. |
Unlike the Holocaust, which
the Jewish community is rightly mentioning daily for the
world to remember, the Catholic Holocaust has been not only
forgotten, it has become an unmentionable subject. A taboo
word. Most of the Protestants have contributed, with the
Vatican, to make the world forget the atrocities of Catholic
Croatia. |
In short, Artukovic had been a minor war criminal who
had executed a few hundred civilians simply for military or political
motivation. Religion had been totally omitted. Indeed, had not even been
mentioned. A proof if there needed to be one of the tacit concordance
reached between the Vatican, the USA and the communist authorities of
Yugoslavia long before the trial itself.
But the mendacity of the nature of the trial became
even more glaring, by the fact concerning the omission of the
proportionally immense massacre of the Orthodox Serbs during the
Croatian Regime.
During the trial not only was the Catholic Church
never mentioned; there had been not even a single hint concerning the
horrendous reality that, hidden behind that general
over-simplification—namely that those who had been murdered had been
mainly Jews and Gypsies, adding as an additional item "and Serbs" to the
other no less horrendous reality that "and Serbs" meant ninety-nine
percent of the total victims, most of them belonging to the Orthodox
Church. Also the fact that the Serbs had been made to perish because
they belonged to a Church, which the Catholic State of Croatia had
considered inimical to the Catholic Church, and to the plan of the
Vatican, which had connived the birth of the Croatian State itself.
During the Zagreb trial of Artukovic, the world press
never dared to mention these facts. The collective silence of the
European and American media would be incredible, had it not been a sad
reality that most of it had been silenced by fear of the reaction of the
Catholic Church of the USA, whose silent pressure had been felt in the
editorial offices of newspaper and TV stations.
The trial which was concluded in May 1986 thus seemed
to have closed a chapter of history, one of planned genocide and,
perhaps even worse, of religious persecution carried out with the
connivance of the Vatican, which had protected those who had acted as
the instruments of the horrendous Croatian experience.[3]
The Vatican had not only been exculpated from its
participation in the whole affair, it was not even mentioned. Indeed,
the Catholic Church, whose exertions had loomed so prominently in the
Catholic concentration camps, was made to look like a helpless witness:
indirectly some organs of the American media had gone so far as to hint
that it had helped the victims of Croat Nazism.
The Protestants of the USA, with few exceptions, acted
likewise. Their cowardice, plus the Catholic operational energy, and the
collaboration of the American media, had all contributed to the
distortion of the historical truth.
When a whole nation is deliberately kept in total
ignorance of certain horrendous historical facts, that nation is
endangered. In our case, the obliteration of the fact that the Vatican
had so prominently participated in the creation of the Catholic State of
Croatia. A crime against the right of the American people to be
informed.
The rabid nationalism, and the ferocious religious
dogmatism which created Catholic Croatia one day might be resurrected
anew. Not only in Europe, but also in other parts of the world,
including the Western Hemisphere, indeed, including the USA itself.
An omen. And a warning.
Footnotes
1. The Times, London, March 30, 1960.
[Back]
2. The Times, London, May 16, 1986.[Back]
3. Reports from Belgrade May 14, 15, 1986.[Back]
|
|